Choose another language:

Vote: , into google:

I wanted to compare my product to be full all copiers existing file. Take it for a more personal view, I therefore compared ultracopier, supercopier, teracopy and copyhandler

Here none of:

• Better than Teracopy
• Better than SuperCopier
• Better than CopyHandler
• It's quick
• It's beautiful

I compare the real feature, and no-subjective value.

Ultracopier The benefits of ultracopier overlooked other copiers in my opinion: Multi-plateform (linux, mac and windows) Written in C++ for all peaple can develop Lot of version (normal, 64Bits, portable, debug) Written in Qt to take advantage of this lib (translation, themes, css, plugin, ...) Try standardized a maximum of things and to share up to code, and to a maximum of lib internally and with other Copiers Increased vigilance for the safety of transferring data Very good roadmap and technical document or simplified, good community and very responsive developer (I have tools for high performance instant notification) Nice site tailor-made and a platform to create a great community Updated regularly, svn version available for the latest version not yet released Disadvantages: Missing some packages (including Linux rpm) Faults in the site (we just not be good everywhere), English not very English Very few donations so I can not devote myself fully to ultracopier Some translations are done via Google Translator, but facilitated the translation system will have to change it Supercopier The Overlooked Benefits of SuperCopier Other copiers in my opinion: Longstanding Is very efficient Runs under wine if you throw the copies by hand Open source Disadvantages: Written in Pascal, no developer can help No new version for a long time, the project is dead for many No portable version, no native 64bit version Teracopy The benefits of teracopy overlooked other copiers in my opinion: Copy parameter adaptation according to the media source and destination Disadvantages: Paying Few change No option to copy window Crash under windows 8 (bad bug/crash prevention) Only under windows Utility to manage the buffer size by the slider highlighted on the interface? Copy handler The benefits of copy handler overlooked other copiers in my opinion: Written in C + + for everyone to develop, but some specific to Windows and Visual Studio required Is efficient Small window ready systray that bit better suit some Disadvantages: Only under Windows and had problems with new windows, but it's fixed Version enough sleep (was done mostly middle 2009), only maintained, no new version planned Interface fairly hot oven and useful information for developers who want to optimize There is no portable version

ultracopier supercopier teracopy copyhandler Environment Windows Windows 8 7 64Bits version 8 Mac Linux Mobile Version portable 1 Totally Free Opensource Use catchcopy v0001 2 Use catchcopy v0002 3 Interface Plugins 3 Skins/Themes 4 4 Mode detailled or simple Default action for colisions/errors Management for the copy list Limit the speed Rename auto Download plugins/skins 6 Options of copy avanced Add new file in copying Notification area Control space Version debug with report 5 Keep first plan Keep the rights Copy engine options Choosing the copy engine 3 Detection updated 6 Autodetection buffer Community Forum News, site dedicated and rss Fast support Activity there as - de 6 months use/installation guide Have bad support of mixed architechture, and no intercept the copy In version 0.2 In version 0.3 not yet realized Some slight customization of interface elements Encrypted file / binary is too small to have sufficient information in case of trouble Site not done Crash on copy and after close on windows 8 64Bits Have lot of duplication of dll/exe into 32Bits